Majority of US now Supports marijuana legalization, Pot Could become Legal

Marijuana Legalization: A fresh survey found that majority of people in United states now supports to Legalize Pot. The pot prohibition law now seems going up in smoke, as a majority of Americans support the legalization of marijuana for the first time in recent history, according to a recent survey.

Researchers asked 1,680 people whether they thought marijuana should be made legal.

According to the General Social Survey (GSS), which is considered the nation’s most reliable, 51.7 percent said they supported legalization and 41.7 percent said they opposed it, while 6.6 percent were undecided.

“We’ve been measuring public attitudes toward legalization of marijuana since the ’70s,” Tom W. Smith, director of the GSS, said in an interview with Yahoo News. “In 2012, you had a plurality of Americans against legalization. Now, in 2014, you have a majority in favor of legalization.”

The Washington Post, which first reported on this new data, points out that the drastic change resembles America’s evolving opinion on gay marriage — and there has been a drastic change in the past few years.

Smith notes that the percentage of undecided respondents on the question of marijuana has been relatively high over the past decade.

“It shows how attitudes are in flux. They’re just not sure,” Smith said. “They might think medical marijuana is OK but not further than that.”

He suggested that some Americans may need to weigh the longstanding reputation of cannabis as a gateway drug with the reality of recreational use in Colorado, Washington State, Alaska, the District of Columbia and (this July) Oregon.

Back in 1973, the first year of the survey, only 19.2 percent of Americans supported legalization. That figure bottomed out at 15.6 percent in 1987 but has climbed more or less steadily ever since.

Morgan Fox, communications manager for the Marijuana Policy Project, says that Americans are tired of laws that punish adults for enjoying a substance that many argue is safer than alcohol.

“Hopefully their elected officials are paying attention and preparing for the inevitable,” Fox said in a statement. “The failures of marijuana prohibition are too obvious to ignore forever, which is evidenced by the growing support for ending it.”

GSS is an in-person survey of adults, who speak either English or Spanish, living in households in the United States.

themarketbusiness.com - Majority of US now Supports marijuana legalization, Pot Could become Legal

Washington State Marijuana Regulators Want Clarity From Feds

OLYMPIA, WA – Two Washington state regulators who are drafting rules for the state’s newly legal recreational marijuana industry said they would benefit from clearer directives by the federal government on how to build a system that would avoid being shut down.

Chris Marr, one of three appointed members of the state Liquor Control Board charged with drafting state pot rules, said the U.S. Department of Justice had so far provided scant guidance on how to develop an industry that federal authorities, who view pot as an illegal drug, won’t feel compelled to shutter.

“Policy is being established that will be a precursor for a large number of states,” Marr said. “It’s irresponsible. They should at least engage even if just for the purposes of information gathering.”

Washington and Colorado last November became the first U.S. states to legalize recreational pot use, even as the drug remains illegal under federal law, and both expect to have recreational-use marijuana stores open starting next year.

Despite the federal prohibition of cannabis, the states are proceeding with efforts to create rules for their nascent markets with provisions including advertising restrictions and security requirements for growing operations.

Engagement in those efforts could give federal authorities a voice in a process that could also serve as a model for other states that may pursue legalization in the future, Marr said.

But apart from a handful of opaque or piecemeal statements, the Obama administration has been tight-lipped in how it plans to respond to state legalization of the recreational marijuana.

In December, President Barack Obama told ABC news that he “has bigger fish to fry” than going after recreational marijuana users. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder later told a U.S. House subcommittee he was committed to upholding federal drug laws.

“People on the outside may think that ‘Surely they’re monitoring it, getting information quietly,’” Marr said. “My understanding is as far as the federal government is concerned they’ve been totally unengaged.”

Ruthann Kurose, Marr’s colleague on the Liquor Control Board, agreed that more feedback from the Obama administration would be helpful, but was reluctant to level criticism.

“They have to think not only about one or two states but about the national implications,” Kurose said. “I do think it would be easier if we had some clarity.”

Board Chairwoman Sharon Foster was not immediately available for comment. The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment.

But a spokesman for Washington state Governor Jay Inslee, a Democrat, said Inslee and state Attorney General Bob Ferguson had met with Holder in January to discuss the state’s plans.

In that meeting, Holder posed questions on issues from labeling requirements to keeping pot from leaving the state, and Inslee responded in a letter the following month, the spokesman said. Inslee has not been in direct contact with Holder since.

“But our Washington D.C. staff stays in touch with the Department of Justice, and we made sure they saw the draft rules and the final rules when they came out. They’re aware of what’s happening,” Inslee spokesman David Postman said.

Postman said that “it would be nice to have an affirmative statement from the federal government that they would allow things to happen.” He said the Justice Department had offered no timeline for clarifying its position.

One clue to how the federal government will handle recreational pot may lie in its approach to the medical marijuana industry, which now legally operates in 18 states and the District of Columbia.

The Justice Department has given individual U.S. Attorneys some discretion in taking state laws into account in addressing medical pot, marijuana business lawyer Hilary Bricken said.

In Washington state, Bricken said, there is “a vast difference” in approach between the Seattle-based Western District and the more rural Eastern District, with the latter taking a harder line in shutting dispensaries and growing operations.

In Marr’s view, such decentralization raises the prospect of a recreational-use system that “is allowed to flourish” in one part of the state but “not allowed to function” in another.

Emily Langlie, spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Washington, referred questions to the Justice Department. A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney for the state’s Eastern District did not return a call for comment.

Washington State Marijuana Regulators Want Clarity From Feds