cookie
Translate
Visualizzazione post con etichetta ohio. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta ohio. Mostra tutti i post
giovedì 12 novembre 2015
martedì 3 novembre 2015
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WANE) – Ohio voters could make history when they head to the polls Tuesday. Depending on the outcome of the election, Ohio could become the first state to legalize marijuana for both medical and recreational use in a single vote.
The decision comes down to votes on two issues, though. Issue 3 on the ballot led to the creation of Issue 2, which could keep Issue 3 from actually happening. It’s easy to see how this can get confusing, but here’s how it all breaks down.
Voting YES to Issue 3 would legalize marijuana and create 10 facilities across the state with exclusive commercial growing rights. The locations are spread out across Ohio and have big name investors including recording artist Nick Lachey and former NBA player and Indiana hoops legend Oscar Robertson.
Here is a list of the ten Ohio counties that would have marijuana growth, cultivation, and extraction (MGCE) facilities:
Licking
Hamilton
Lorain
Clermont
Lucas
Delaware
Summit
Butler
Franklin
Stark
If Issue 3 passes, monopolies would be come legal immediately and marijuana would become legal 30 days after the election.
To read more about Issue 3, click here.
“Marijuana consumption and purchasing and growing is happening now, and we need to recognize that. Those are dollars that are leaving the state. These are dollars that aren’t taxed. This is product that is unregulated. We are certainly better off to directly address the issue of medical marijuana in this case and then also bring the benefit of jobs, regulations, and taxation to a market that is currently in the shadows,” Jennifer Redman with ResponsibleOhio said.
Because the growing sites are limited to only ten locations, some state lawmakers consider that to be a monopoly and created Issue 2 as a response. Voting YES to Issue 2 would likely kill Issue 3 because it would stop the growing sites.
To read more about Issue 2, click here.
“We in the legislature did not feel that people should be able to hijack our constitution and develop monopolies,” Representative Tony Burkley said. “No matter what your opinion is on marijuana, to have a monopoly spelled out in the Ohio constitution is just crazy. It’s like saying that the only cars that can be sold in Ohio are General Motors. I mean that’s basically what they’re saying.”
Issue 3 supporters said the sites don’t form a monopoly because they could add more if the demand grows. They also have plans to take sites away if they don’t follow the rules or meet the quality requirements put in place.
“It’s not a monopoly at all. It’s just a regulated industry,” Redman said. “It will bring thousands of jobs to Ohio. It will be regulated and tested marijuana so consumers know what they’re putting into their bodies. It will bring millions of dollars in annual tax revenue for our counties, townships, and municipalities.”
“I don’t really think that’s a valid argument. They talk about adding or subtracting and in all reality, I don’t think that will ever happen. They may expand it if there are people willing to cough up the money, but I don’t think that’s really a valid argument with the way the wording of the Issue 3 is,” Burkley said. “They always say well, you can always change that later and there’s opportunities for more people to come in, but by that time, issues are not that easy to get approved in Ohio so that theory is not an accurate one in my opinion.”
Issue 3 supporters said legalizing marijuana for anyone 21 years or older is a safe and smart move.
“We are asking Ohioans to make the adult choice and to bring this out of the shadows into light and to really benefit Ohio with the jobs, the money, and the regulation that it needs,” Redman said.
However, those for Issue 2 argue Issue 3 supporters are only focusing on the financial impact and not the potentially harmful health consequences.
“We talk about heroin epidemics in Ohio and across the nation actually and if you talk to many of them, that’s where they started out was marijuana. I’m not saying marijuana is a gateway drug, but it just gets them on the path of stimulation by chemical means, and it’s just not a good situation,” Burkley said. “Most of the people that would have to deal with the consequences of the passage of Issue 3 are definitely against it. Even the medical profession views this as not the way to go when it comes to even medical marijuana. There are far more people that have to deal with the repercussions that are opposed to Issue 3 instead of those that are promoting it.”
Regardless of Tuesday’s outcome, people on both sides said it’s likely the issues will turn into lawsuits and go to court.
“I think that’s eventually going to end up in the court, which is really not a place where the voters really want that to happen and it’s just unfortunate,” Burkley said.
NewsChannel 15’s sister station WDTN put together the following breakdown of what each vote could mean:
1.) I want marijuana legalized.
Vote No on 2 and Yes on 3.
Vote ‘No’ on Issue 2 means you do not want to prohibit a monopoly (this then does not prohibit ResponsibleOhio’s amendment, which is considered a monopoly by the state)
Vote ‘Yes’ on Issue 3 means you want to legalize marijuana
2.) I do not want marijuana legalized.
Vote Yes on 2 and No on 3.
Vote ‘Yes’ on Issue 2 means you want to prohibit a monopoly (this then prohibits ResponsibleOhio’s amendment, which is considered a monopoly by the state)
Vote ‘No’ on Issue 3 means you do not want to legalize marijuana
3.) I want marijuana legalized, and I want to prohibit economic monopolies.
Vote Yes on 2 and Yes on 3.
Vote ‘Yes’ on Issue 2 means you want to prohibit a monopoly (this then prohibits ResponsibleOhio’s amendment, which is considered a monopoly by the state)
Vote ‘Yes’ on Issue 3 means you want to legalize marijuana
Voting like this creates a roadblock to ResponsibleOhio’s plans since the outcome of Issue 2 goes into effect immediately and therefore prohibits a monopoly and the state considers ResponsibleOhio’s a monopoly.
4.) I do not want marijuana legalized, and I do not want to prohibit a monopoly.
Vote No on 2 and No on 3.
Vote ‘No’ on Issue 2 means you do not want to prohibit a monopoly (this then does not prohibit ResponsibleOhio’s amendment, which is considered a monopoly by the state)
Vote ‘No’ on Issue 3 means you do not want to legalize marijuana
Voting like this does not legalize marijuana, but it does allow for economic monopolies. The outcome of Issue 2 goes into effect immediately, and so economic monopolies would be legal in Ohio.
The decision comes down to votes on two issues, though. Issue 3 on the ballot led to the creation of Issue 2, which could keep Issue 3 from actually happening. It’s easy to see how this can get confusing, but here’s how it all breaks down.
Voting YES to Issue 3 would legalize marijuana and create 10 facilities across the state with exclusive commercial growing rights. The locations are spread out across Ohio and have big name investors including recording artist Nick Lachey and former NBA player and Indiana hoops legend Oscar Robertson.
Here is a list of the ten Ohio counties that would have marijuana growth, cultivation, and extraction (MGCE) facilities:
Licking
Hamilton
Lorain
Clermont
Lucas
Delaware
Summit
Butler
Franklin
Stark
If Issue 3 passes, monopolies would be come legal immediately and marijuana would become legal 30 days after the election.
To read more about Issue 3, click here.
“Marijuana consumption and purchasing and growing is happening now, and we need to recognize that. Those are dollars that are leaving the state. These are dollars that aren’t taxed. This is product that is unregulated. We are certainly better off to directly address the issue of medical marijuana in this case and then also bring the benefit of jobs, regulations, and taxation to a market that is currently in the shadows,” Jennifer Redman with ResponsibleOhio said.
To read more about Issue 2, click here.
“We in the legislature did not feel that people should be able to hijack our constitution and develop monopolies,” Representative Tony Burkley said. “No matter what your opinion is on marijuana, to have a monopoly spelled out in the Ohio constitution is just crazy. It’s like saying that the only cars that can be sold in Ohio are General Motors. I mean that’s basically what they’re saying.”
Issue 3 supporters said the sites don’t form a monopoly because they could add more if the demand grows. They also have plans to take sites away if they don’t follow the rules or meet the quality requirements put in place.
“It’s not a monopoly at all. It’s just a regulated industry,” Redman said. “It will bring thousands of jobs to Ohio. It will be regulated and tested marijuana so consumers know what they’re putting into their bodies. It will bring millions of dollars in annual tax revenue for our counties, townships, and municipalities.”
“I don’t really think that’s a valid argument. They talk about adding or subtracting and in all reality, I don’t think that will ever happen. They may expand it if there are people willing to cough up the money, but I don’t think that’s really a valid argument with the way the wording of the Issue 3 is,” Burkley said. “They always say well, you can always change that later and there’s opportunities for more people to come in, but by that time, issues are not that easy to get approved in Ohio so that theory is not an accurate one in my opinion.”
Issue 3 supporters said legalizing marijuana for anyone 21 years or older is a safe and smart move.
“We are asking Ohioans to make the adult choice and to bring this out of the shadows into light and to really benefit Ohio with the jobs, the money, and the regulation that it needs,” Redman said.
However, those for Issue 2 argue Issue 3 supporters are only focusing on the financial impact and not the potentially harmful health consequences.
“We talk about heroin epidemics in Ohio and across the nation actually and if you talk to many of them, that’s where they started out was marijuana. I’m not saying marijuana is a gateway drug, but it just gets them on the path of stimulation by chemical means, and it’s just not a good situation,” Burkley said. “Most of the people that would have to deal with the consequences of the passage of Issue 3 are definitely against it. Even the medical profession views this as not the way to go when it comes to even medical marijuana. There are far more people that have to deal with the repercussions that are opposed to Issue 3 instead of those that are promoting it.”
Regardless of Tuesday’s outcome, people on both sides said it’s likely the issues will turn into lawsuits and go to court.
“I think that’s eventually going to end up in the court, which is really not a place where the voters really want that to happen and it’s just unfortunate,” Burkley said.
NewsChannel 15’s sister station WDTN put together the following breakdown of what each vote could mean:
1.) I want marijuana legalized.
Vote No on 2 and Yes on 3.
Vote ‘No’ on Issue 2 means you do not want to prohibit a monopoly (this then does not prohibit ResponsibleOhio’s amendment, which is considered a monopoly by the state)
Vote ‘Yes’ on Issue 3 means you want to legalize marijuana
2.) I do not want marijuana legalized.
Vote Yes on 2 and No on 3.
Vote ‘Yes’ on Issue 2 means you want to prohibit a monopoly (this then prohibits ResponsibleOhio’s amendment, which is considered a monopoly by the state)
Vote ‘No’ on Issue 3 means you do not want to legalize marijuana
3.) I want marijuana legalized, and I want to prohibit economic monopolies.
Vote Yes on 2 and Yes on 3.
Vote ‘Yes’ on Issue 2 means you want to prohibit a monopoly (this then prohibits ResponsibleOhio’s amendment, which is considered a monopoly by the state)
Vote ‘Yes’ on Issue 3 means you want to legalize marijuana
Voting like this creates a roadblock to ResponsibleOhio’s plans since the outcome of Issue 2 goes into effect immediately and therefore prohibits a monopoly and the state considers ResponsibleOhio’s a monopoly.
4.) I do not want marijuana legalized, and I do not want to prohibit a monopoly.
Vote No on 2 and No on 3.
Vote ‘No’ on Issue 2 means you do not want to prohibit a monopoly (this then does not prohibit ResponsibleOhio’s amendment, which is considered a monopoly by the state)
Vote ‘No’ on Issue 3 means you do not want to legalize marijuana
Voting like this does not legalize marijuana, but it does allow for economic monopolies. The outcome of Issue 2 goes into effect immediately, and so economic monopolies would be legal in Ohio.
Etichette:
cannabis,
Issues 2 and 3,
legalization,
ohio
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)
Etichette
1976
60 Minutes
ADUC droghe
ASCIA
Amendment 64
American College of Physicians
Amsterdam
Andrea Riccardi
Anno zero
Associazione Pazienti Impazienti Cannabis
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Business Insider
CNN
Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice
Colombia
Colorado
Consiglio dei Ministri
Denver
Dimissioni Serpelloni
Initiative 502
Jeffrey Miron
OEDT
ONU
Olanda
SSN
The house I live in
Washington
antiproibizionismo
attualità
beppe grillo
businessweek
california
canapa
cannabis
cannabis ed economia
cannabis terapeutica
carceri
carta di parma
crisi economica
droga
droghe leggere
economia
fini-giovanardi
gazzetta di parma
global commission on drug policy
governo Monti
lancet
lavoce.info
legalizzazione
legalizzazione cannabis
lettere al direttore
libro
marijuana
mario monti
messico
pensieri
politica
proibizionismo
prostituzione
riflessioni
sicurezza
sole24ore
war on drugs
Archivio blog
- gennaio 2020 (1)
- dicembre 2019 (8)
- novembre 2019 (10)
- ottobre 2019 (10)
- settembre 2019 (8)
- agosto 2019 (6)
- luglio 2019 (10)
- giugno 2019 (10)
- maggio 2019 (11)
- aprile 2019 (10)
- marzo 2019 (12)
- febbraio 2019 (8)
- gennaio 2019 (9)
- dicembre 2018 (6)
- novembre 2018 (10)
- ottobre 2018 (12)
- settembre 2018 (6)
- agosto 2018 (4)
- luglio 2018 (5)
- giugno 2018 (2)
- maggio 2018 (1)
- aprile 2018 (3)
- marzo 2018 (7)
- febbraio 2018 (2)
- dicembre 2017 (1)
- novembre 2017 (5)
- ottobre 2017 (7)
- settembre 2017 (4)
- agosto 2017 (8)
- luglio 2017 (6)
- giugno 2017 (5)
- maggio 2017 (9)
- aprile 2017 (8)
- marzo 2017 (6)
- febbraio 2017 (8)
- gennaio 2017 (8)
- dicembre 2016 (4)
- novembre 2016 (5)
- ottobre 2016 (1)
- settembre 2016 (8)
- agosto 2016 (7)
- luglio 2016 (7)
- giugno 2016 (11)
- maggio 2016 (14)
- aprile 2016 (14)
- marzo 2016 (13)
- febbraio 2016 (11)
- gennaio 2016 (22)
- dicembre 2015 (17)
- novembre 2015 (29)
- ottobre 2015 (21)
- settembre 2015 (8)
- agosto 2015 (13)
- luglio 2015 (8)
- giugno 2015 (8)
- maggio 2015 (9)
- aprile 2015 (11)
- marzo 2015 (13)
- febbraio 2015 (14)
- gennaio 2015 (13)
- dicembre 2014 (10)
- novembre 2014 (1)
- ottobre 2014 (2)
- settembre 2014 (1)
- agosto 2014 (2)
- luglio 2014 (3)
- giugno 2014 (5)
- maggio 2014 (12)
- aprile 2014 (7)
- marzo 2014 (7)
- febbraio 2014 (14)
- gennaio 2014 (20)
- dicembre 2013 (9)
- novembre 2013 (2)
- ottobre 2013 (8)
- settembre 2013 (4)
- agosto 2013 (2)
- luglio 2013 (5)
- giugno 2013 (8)
- maggio 2013 (7)
- aprile 2013 (6)
- marzo 2013 (11)
- febbraio 2013 (11)
- gennaio 2013 (18)
- dicembre 2012 (23)
- novembre 2012 (24)
- ottobre 2012 (14)
- settembre 2012 (7)
- agosto 2012 (4)
- luglio 2012 (6)
- giugno 2012 (10)
- maggio 2012 (11)
- aprile 2012 (12)
- marzo 2012 (14)
- febbraio 2012 (10)
- gennaio 2012 (10)
- dicembre 2011 (112)